When a creditor holds an executive instrument — a court judgment, a cheque, a promissory note, a notarized contract — the faster route is usually not a new lawsuit but an execution request on the Najiz platform. This page sets out the official service steps as published by the Ministry of Justice, a short formula for the request content, and the common rejection reasons that delay requests, as part of the enforcement and debt section on Hala Law.

When does the execution request apply?

The execution request service is used when you hold an executive instrument. Sources of executive instruments include commercial papers such as cheques and promissory notes, as well as judgments and judicial decisions and certain notarized contracts and documents, under the current Enforcement Law. Direct enforcement of cheques and commercial papers is a long-standing, settled track in the Enforcement Law — not a recent reform.

If you have no ready executive instrument — a debt evidenced by invoices, an account statement, transfers, or correspondence — the usual route is a financial claim lawsuit. And if you hold an electronically created promissory note, its drafting and enforcement are covered on the promissory note via Nafith page.

Steps to file an execution request on Najiz

Per the Ministry of Justice official service guide, the service runs through these steps:

StepDetail
1. Log inSign in via National Single Sign-On (Nafath)
2. Reach the serviceChoose e-services, then the execution package, then the execution request service
3. New requestSelect a new request, then choose the request type
4. PartiesEnter the details of the execution applicant and the respondent
5. ContentEnter the content of the request
6. InstrumentUpload an image of the executive instrument, attaching a translation if it is not in Arabic
7. Submit and trackSend the request, then track it by request number on Najiz

The interface steps above reflect the last verification on 26 June 2026; labels may change as the platform is updated.

A short formula for the request content

A commonly used short wording for the request content: "I request that the respondent be ordered to pay the amount of (…) Saudi riyals under the attached executive instrument, with the statutory enforcement measures taken — including notification, asset disclosure, seizure, and collection — and that they bear any costs and fees due under the law, if any." What matters is that the amount and the names match the instrument exactly.

Common rejection reasons

ReasonExplanation
Unclear copy of the instrumentThe uploaded image is unreadable or incomplete
Debtor detail mismatchThe debtor's name or ID number in the request does not match the instrument
Due date not reachedThe instrument's due date has not yet arrived
Not an executive instrumentThe document lacks executive character or first requires a judgment
Amount mismatchThe amount in the request does not match the instrument
Missing translationA foreign-language instrument without a certified translation where required

Statutory transition status

A new Enforcement Law was approved by Council of Ministers Resolution No. 746 of 26/10/1447H. Article 65 provides that it comes into force 180 days after its publication in the official gazette, and Article 7 makes bills of exchange and promissory notes enforceable instruments only where they are registered on the national electronic platforms, with the implementing regulations to set the conditions and controls for that registration. This page is based on the current Enforcement Law and will be reviewed when the new law and its implementing regulations take effect.

What happens after submission?

Once the request is accepted, the statutory enforcement measures proceed, including — per the source material — notifying the debtor, asset disclosure, seizure, and collection procedures. If you are on the other side — a respondent who has received an execution order — the different response tracks are set out on the objecting to an execution order page.

When do you need a licensed lawyer?

The information here is a general framework, not an assessment of any specific case. The matter becomes case-specific — warranting a licensed lawyer or accredited advisor — when:

  • The instrument itself is disputed — such as a forgery claim or a disagreement over its executive character.
  • Multiple parties, instruments, or overlapping claims span more than one file.
  • Enforcement intersects with an insolvency claim or with the bankruptcy tracks of a merchant or company.
  • Choosing the right track in the first place — direct execution or a lawsuit — turns on the documents of your specific case.

In those situations, each party's position rests on the documents and evidence presented to the competent authority — not on any single general rule.