Three sections with different roles
Article 163 of the Law of Civil Procedure requires the judgment to be recorded after the reasons on which it is based. Article 164 addresses public pronouncement by reading the operative part or the operative part with reasons. Article 166 says the judgment deed contains the claim summary, response, defenses, reasons, and judgment text, among other data. Source 1
On that structural basis, the map shows three fixed locations:
| Section | Role in this map |
|---|---|
| Case summary or facts | Material summarizing the claim, response, and defenses |
| Reasons for judgment | Reasoning before the judgment text |
| Operative part or judgment text | The structural location of what the court pronounced |
These are section labels, not an interpretation of their content. The tool does not read a judgment deed, turn reasons into orders, summarize the operative part, or decide what it requires of an individual party.
What a heading cannot establish
The map does not infer finality, enforceability, whether a party won or lost, or an objection route. It also does not calculate an objection deadline; those matters are not established merely because the deed contains an “operative part” heading. Deed status is checked through the Ministry of Justice service for that purpose. Source 2
If the operative part contains ambiguity, Article 173 provides for an interpretation request to the issuing court, and Article 174 makes the interpretation complementary to the original judgment. The map therefore links the official correction or interpretation service instead of interpreting the wording. Source 3 Source 4
Family and privacy boundaries
The current version does not generalize this map to commercial, criminal, and administrative judgments. It stops for those families and when the deed type is unknown. There is no field for judgment text, case number, party name, or file upload. Public sharing contains only the structural distinction and source.