Trademark protection in Saudi Arabia falls under the Saudi Authority for Intellectual Property (SAIP) and is governed by the Trademark Law of the Gulf Cooperation Council States. Protection turns on the filing date: Article 17 provides that once a mark is registered, the effect of registration relates back to the date the application was filed, and Article 10 requires all applications to be suspended where two or more persons apply at the same time for the same, a closely similar, or a similar mark in one class. Timing is what orders the positions. This page maps the full registration path — documents, steps, fees, and timelines — as documented up to June 2026, within the business guides on Hala Law.
The first-to-file rule: why timing matters
Because the system protects whoever files first, postponing registration until after launch opens a practical gap: any other party that files for a similar name before the business owner gains the stronger position. This is why trademark filing appears early in the business setup sequence — and anyone planning to franchise should note what the Franchise Law actually requires: article 1 ties a franchise to a trademark or trade name the franchisor owns or is licensed to use, and the Ministry of Commerce lists only the agreement and the disclosure document as registration documents — so a Saudi registration certificate is not a stated precondition, though owning or being licensed to the mark is what the definition rests on. See franchise registration.
Classes and the Nice Classification
Article 9 provides that a trademark may be registered for one or more classes of goods or services, as the implementing regulation determines. The same article adds a rule that matters when similarity is assessed: goods or services are not similar merely because they fall in the same class, nor different merely because they fall in different classes.
In practice, SAIP's published fees are calculated per class, so extending protection to a further class raises the cost by the same amount. Choosing the right classes from the start therefore remains a substantive decision, with the description of goods and services conforming to SAIP standards.
Required documents
- A high-resolution graphic representation of the mark.
- Applicant identification data: the entity's Commercial Registration, or a National ID for individuals.
- A comprehensive description of the goods or services conforming exactly to SAIP standards.
Registration steps on the SAIP portal
- Access the SAIP portal and run the similarity search before filing.
- Submit the initial application with the mark, the chosen class, and pay the filing and examination fee.
- Examination at SAIP. Article 12 requires the competent authority to decide the application within ninety days of filing where it meets the conditions.
- On acceptance: publication, with any interested party able to file a written opposition within sixty days of the publication date under Article 14.
- Where the opposition period passes with no opposition filed, Article 16 requires the competent authority to register the mark as soon as it expires, and the registration certificate issues once its fee is paid.
Where an opposition is filed, the authority notifies the applicant with a copy within thirty days, and the applicant must file a written reply within sixty days of that notification, failing which they are deemed to have withdrawn the application — a deadline whose lapse ends the application rather than merely delaying it.
The steps above reflect the last verification in June 2026; labels and screens may change as the platforms are updated.
Official fees
Per SAIP's published service fees — fees change by subsequent decisions:
| Item | Fee (SAR) |
|---|---|
| Filing and examination | 1,000 |
| Publication | 500 |
| Final registration certificate | 5,000 |
| Total per class | 6,500 |
Because the fees are paid in stages, a prior similarity search and precise classification before filing are steps with a direct financial impact. Where an application is refused or made conditional, Article 13 lets the applicant appeal within sixty days of notification to the committee set out in the implementing regulation, and then challenge that committee's decision before the competent court within sixty days.
Expected timeline
The periods the law sets are: ninety days to decide an application that meets the conditions (Article 12), then sixty days to oppose from the date of publication (Article 14). The actual time to certificate depends on whether the application is complete and whether an opposition is filed; the law sets no overall ceiling.
What the certificate gives you
Article 17 gives the owner of a registered mark an exclusive right to use it and to prevent others — who have not obtained their consent — from using it or any identical or similar sign. Article 20 sets protection at ten years, renewable for like periods on an application filed during the final year, and renewable too within the six months following expiry; where those pass without renewal, the mark is struck from the register. The mark is therefore an asset used in franchising and licensing to third parties. It is distinct from reserving a trade name in the Commercial Registration — each provides a separate scope of protection.
When do you need a licensed lawyer or advisor?
The information above is a general framework, not an assessment of any specific mark. Engaging an IP attorney or licensed advisor carries direct practical weight when:
- You want a comprehensive availability search before filing. We found nothing in SAIP's material stating whether the filing fee is refundable on rejection, so we make no claim either way — the search is worth doing on its own merits.
- Your activity requires precise alignment with Nice Classification classes or coverage across several classes in parallel applications.
- Your application faces a third-party opposition during the publication window, or you intend to oppose a published mark.
- You plan to use the mark in franchise or licensing agreements that need drafting to preserve your rights.
In those situations your position turns on facts and technical judgments that differ from one mark to another — not on a single general rule.